From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Thu Aug 31 18:17:36 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id SAA74633;
	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:17:36 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from finch-post-12.mail.demon.net (finch-post-12.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.41])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA74623;
	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:17:33 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com)
Received: from nlsys.demon.co.uk ([158.152.125.33] helo=herring.nlsystems.com)
	by finch-post-12.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 13UQTO-0009Lt-0C; Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:17:27 +0000
Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.3])
	by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA26925;
	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:19:25 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:24:20 +0100 (BST)
From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
To: Takanori Watanabe <takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
cc: iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org, acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, dfr@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <200008310833.RAA71716@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008311023220.24553-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 595
Subject: [acpi-jp 595] Re: PCI changes affect ACPI bus space access code.
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: dfr@nlsystems.com

On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Takanori Watanabe wrote:

> In message <20000831150333W.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, Mitsuru IWASAKI $B$5$s$$$o$/(B
> :
> 
> >pci_cfg{read/write} was moved to sys/pci/pci_compat.c, but it doesn't matter.
> 
> Ah ,that was moved..I don't aware of it.
> 
> >> DEVMETHOD access to parent.In this case,there is no way to reach nexus-pcib.
> >
> >OK, how about this as Doug suggested previously?
> 
> Seems good.That is better than my previous code,
> 
> >It seems to work for me and it's much closer to what you are trying to
> >achieve.  If not, please correct me.
> 
> Yes.

I like this version better.

-- 
Doug Rabson				Mail:  dfr@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.			Phone: +44 20 8348 3944


