From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Oct  9 00:09:43 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id AAA88212;
	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:09:43 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tasogare.imasy.or.jp (daemon@tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA88207
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:09:43 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (iwasaki.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.92])
	by tasogare.imasy.or.jp (8.10.2+3.3W/3.7W-tasogare/smtpfeed 1.07) with ESMTP id e98F9fr13767
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:09:41 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20001008100845P.yokoyama@jp.FreeBSD.org>
References: <20001007000530S.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
	<20001008100845P.yokoyama@jp.FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20001009000938Y.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 00:09:38 +0900
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 22
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 829
Subject: [acpi-jp 829] Re: Any objections for ACPICA migration?
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org

> > Anybody has objections for ACPICA migration?  I think now is the time
> > to make our decision because we already evaluated both older code and
> > ACPICA-based code for about 1 week.
> 
> I have no objection. I agree to migrate ACPICA-based code.

Thanks yokoyama-san.  We're going to decide if no objections until
comming Tuesday 0:00 JST.

I have one suggestion.  Shall we move old sys/dev/acpi/aml/* to
usr.sbin/acpi/amldb/aml/ before removing old code ?
I've tried little bit ACPICA-based userland debugger and I noticed
that it different from our amldb about its usage.  I think that our
amldb is still usefull even after ACPICA migration because of I/O
emulation and developers are able to track the target AML on different
machine.  On the other hand, it seems that ACPICA debugger was
designed for running on the actual target machine.
I think it would be worth to have two AML debuggers and interpreter
code for a while.  Also it's good for our reference comparing their
implementaions in order to fit ACPICA code into FreeBSD more.

Comments?
