From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Oct  9 16:36:47 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id QAA40224;
	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:36:47 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp [133.30.50.200])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA40219
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:36:46 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp)
Received: from shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA65056
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:35:10 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp)
Message-Id: <200010090735.QAA65056@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Oct 2000 00:09:38 JST."
             <20001009000938Y.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 16:35:10 +0900
From: Takanori Watanabe <takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 838
Subject: [acpi-jp 838] Re: Any objections for ACPICA migration?
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp

In message <20001009000938Y.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, Mitsuru IWASAKI $B$5$s$$$o$/(B
:
>emulation and developers are able to track the target AML on different
>machine.  On the other hand, it seems that ACPICA debugger was
>designed for running on the actual target machine.

It is not true. If we write Osd routine for emulate I/O,
ACPICA debugger can do so.

>I think it would be worth to have two AML debuggers and interpreter
>code for a while.  Also it's good for our reference comparing their
>implementaions in order to fit ACPICA code into FreeBSD more.

In this point,I agree with you.

