From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Fri Oct 13 07:16:52 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id HAA70852;
	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:16:52 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA70815
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:16:51 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from andrew.grover@intel.com)
Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs01-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.201])
	by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id WAA04491
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 22:18:05 GMT
Received: from fmsmsx17.intel.com ([132.233.48.17]) by 132.233.48.201
  (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ;
  Thu, 12 Oct 2000 22:16:50 0000 (GMT)
Received: by fmsmsx17.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <4VB8AW5F>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:16:49 -0700
Message-ID: <4148FEAAD879D311AC5700A0C969E8905DE3DF@orsmsx35.jf.intel.com>
From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org'" <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:16:47 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 865
Subject: [acpi-jp 865] RE: Another ACPICA workaround: default return v
	alue 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: andrew.grover@intel.com

I don't think so. Portege 320, 3110, and Tecra 8000 all passed HCT, I
assume. They have the Windows sticker, anyways...;-)

-- Andy

> Does the Windows ACPI HCT flag this as bad code or not?  If 
> it does, then 
> we have something to beat up the vendor with and get a patch.  If it 
> doesn't, then I guess we're stuck with patching around it. 8(

