From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Wed Nov 29 05:57:25 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id FAA38449;
	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 05:57:25 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-177-187.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.177.187])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA38444
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 05:57:24 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com)
Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eASL4rF26475
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:04:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com)
Message-Id: <200011282104.eASL4rF26475@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:04:53 -0800
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 931
Subject: [acpi-jp 931] Merge latest ACPICA code?
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: msmith@freebsd.org


I've been watching the back-and-forth over the last few days on various 
issues, and I've also been sitting on an almost-ready merge of the latest 
ACPI CA code.

Since this is a fairly large update, and since there are some fairly 
important issues still outstanding, I'm wondering if people think I 
should go ahead and merge or not.  (The alternative is to wait for the 
next snapshot from Intel - I'd expect that Andy and co. are a month or so 
away with that though.)

How do people feel?  Should I at least keep us up to date, or will that 
disrupt something else?

Thanks!

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E


