From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Wed Dec 27 02:53:26 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id CAA03090;
	Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:53:26 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tasogare.imasy.or.jp (daemon@tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA03085
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:53:25 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (iwasaki.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.92])
	by tasogare.imasy.or.jp (8.11.1+3.4W/3.7W-tasogare/smtpfeed 1.07) with ESMTP id eBQHrNk30483
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:53:23 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <200012261412.eBQECNj85945@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
References: <20001223194013Y.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
	<200012261412.eBQECNj85945@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20001227025321T.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:53:21 +0900
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 24
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1001
Subject: [acpi-jp 1001] Re: ASL compiler development? 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org

> >  - acpicadb	userland ACPICA debugger
> >  - iasl		Intel ASL compiler
> 
> I think it would be good to make ports of these, so that we can point new 
> ACPI hackers at them. 8)

Good idea.  OK, I'll try to make ports when the next ACPICA is released.
Mike, could you import AslCompiler directory as well as Subsystem at
the next your updating ACPICA snapshot?

> > Attated patch is required to compile them.
> 
> The file is already off the vendor branch, so you should just commit this
> change; when you've done that, point Andy at the updated version so the 
> Intel folks can back-merge it into their local tree.
> 
> We should also check our variations from the Intel codebase and make sure 
> that our few local hacks are still relevant...

OK, understood.

Thanks!


