From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Sat Jan 13 23:23:18 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id XAA11789;
	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:23:18 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tasogare.imasy.or.jp (daemon@tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA11782;
	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:23:15 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (iwasaki.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.92])
	by tasogare.imasy.or.jp (8.11.1+3.4W/3.7W-tasogare/smtpfeed 1.07) with ESMTP id f0DENDk91305;
	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:23:13 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org
Cc: iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010112134114.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20010112232818G.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
	<XFMail.010112134114.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010113232313C.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:23:13 +0900
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 20
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1034
Subject: [acpi-jp 1034] Re: Sysctls to control sleep states
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org

Hi,

> >> We
> >> could even use the strings "S0", "S1", etc.  Whatever you all prefer can be
> >> done with ease.
> > 
> > I vote for strings (e.g. S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S4B and S5).
> ># currently we don't support S2-S4B though :-p
> 
> Ok, I've updated acpi_sx.patch to do this.  Also, Mike suggested that I use
> 'acpi' instead of 'acpi0' for the name of the sysctl tree, so with the latest
> patch, one gets:
> 
> hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5
> hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1
> hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: S1

I've tested it.  Cool!  I have no objection on it.

Thanks
