From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Thu Mar 22 10:48:21 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id KAA29338;
	Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:48:21 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (fmfdns02.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA29323
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:48:21 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from andrew.grover@intel.com)
Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs02-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.202])
	by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.35 2001/02/12 09:03:45 smothers Exp $) with SMTP id BAA29992
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 01:48:14 GMT
Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.48.29]) by 132.233.48.202
  (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ;
  Thu, 22 Mar 2001 01:48:14 0000 (GMT)
Received: by fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <HLKF376J>; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:48:13 -0800
Message-ID: <4148FEAAD879D311AC5700A0C969E8905DE79C@orsmsx35.jf.intel.com>
From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org'" <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:47:34 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1116
Subject: [acpi-jp 1116] RE: acpica-unix-20010313.tar.gz 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: andrew.grover@intel.com

> From: Mike Smith [mailto:msmith@freebsd.org]
> That's OK.  I assume you had a good reason for it.  You need 
> to fix the 
> include paths though, since you have inconsistent assumptions about 
> include/platform (in some places you assume it's in the 
> include path, in
> others you explicitly refer to platform/foo.h).

Where were you seeing this? The only places that we should be referencing
platform/foo.h as "foo.h" is from other headers in platform - we're assuming
the current directory is in the search path. So, is that what you're talking
about, do you view this as bad style, or are you referring to other places
altogether?

Regards -- Andy

