From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Tue May 29 10:38:38 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id KAA34645;
	Tue, 29 May 2001 10:38:38 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA34640
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:38:38 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4T1lAB06033
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 May 2001 18:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200105290147.f4T1lAB06033@mass.dis.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 May 2001 20:36:19 +0900."
             <200105231136.UAA58315@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 18:47:10 -0700
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1143
Subject: [acpi-jp 1143] Re: Recent Update. 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: msmith@freebsd.org

> Intel ACPICA have been updated.
> File tree has been reorganized.

I've decided to give up on trying to catch the Intel layout, and I'm just 
going to put all the files in one directory.

I don't think this is going to cause any problems, but I may be wrong.  
If you have any objections, please let me know (I'm waiting for a repo 
copy right now).
 
> I wrote some patch to catch up this.
> (http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica20010518diff.tar.gz)

I think that you've missed the implicit-return-value patch in this.  Or 
is that not needed anymore?

Regards,
Mike

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E


