From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Tue May 29 14:32:01 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id OAA53003;
	Tue, 29 May 2001 14:32:01 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp [133.30.50.200])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA52998
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:32:00 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp)
Received: from shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA96625
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:37:42 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp)
Message-Id: <200105290537.OAA96625@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 May 2001 18:47:10 MST."
             <200105290147.f4T1lAB06033@mass.dis.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:37:42 +0900
From: Takanori Watanabe <takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1144
Subject: [acpi-jp 1144] Re: Recent Update. 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp

In message <200105290147.f4T1lAB06033@mass.dis.org>, Mike Smith $B$5$s$$$o$/(B:
>> Intel ACPICA have been updated.
>> File tree has been reorganized.
>
>I've decided to give up on trying to catch the Intel layout, and I'm just 
>going to put all the files in one directory.
>
>I don't think this is going to cause any problems, but I may be wrong.  
>If you have any objections, please let me know (I'm waiting for a repo 
>copy right now).

I have no objection. Note that in 20010518, file name has also been changed.
(For example, cmalloc.c -> utalloc.c, amconfig.c -> exconfig.c)
And shall we separate include and other source?

>> I wrote some patch to catch up this.
>> (http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica20010518diff.tar.gz)
>
>I think that you've missed the implicit-return-value patch in this.  Or 
>is that not needed anymore?

Simply, I have forgotten to merge it.That should be merged.

$BEOJUB:5*(B
$B?@8MBg3XBg3X1!<+A32J3X8&5f2J(BD3$B>pJs%a%G%#%"2J3X@l96(B
<a href="http://www.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp/~takawata/key.html">
Public Key</a>
Key fingerprint =  2C 51 E2 78 2C E1 C5 2D  0F F1 20 A3 11 3A 62 2A 
