From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Tue May 29 15:08:23 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id PAA56018;
	Tue, 29 May 2001 15:08:23 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA56013
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 May 2001 15:08:22 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4T6H0B18370
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 May 2001 23:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200105290617.f4T6H0B18370@mass.dis.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 May 2001 14:37:42 +0900."
             <200105290537.OAA96625@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 23:17:00 -0700
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1145
Subject: [acpi-jp 1145] Re: Recent Update. 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: msmith@freebsd.org

> >I don't think this is going to cause any problems, but I may be wrong.  
> >If you have any objections, please let me know (I'm waiting for a repo 
> >copy right now).
> 
> I have no objection. Note that in 20010518, file name has also been changed.
> (For example, cmalloc.c -> utalloc.c, amconfig.c -> exconfig.c)

*sigh*  Yeah, I noticed.  Irritating to say the least.

> And shall we separate include and other source?

I wasn't going to; since we're not maintaining the code, it doesn't make 
a lot of sense to go to that much effort.

> >> I wrote some patch to catch up this.
> >> (http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica20010518diff.tar.gz)
> >
> >I think that you've missed the implicit-return-value patch in this.  Or 
> >is that not needed anymore?
> 
> Simply, I have forgotten to merge it.That should be merged.

Ok, thanks.

I've also looked at the archive you posted a little while back.  What's 
the current status on the wake code?  There seems to be several versions 
of it there...

At any rate, I think that what I have is almost ready, I just need to 
find someone to do the repocopy.

Regards,
Mike
-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E



-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E


