From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Wed Jul 11 20:38:51 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id UAA49627;
	Wed, 11 Jul 2001 20:38:51 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tao.org.uk (genesis.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.62])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA49620
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 20:38:48 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk)
Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id 3A656490; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:38:45 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:38:44 +0100
From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20010711123844.A797@tao.org.uk>
References: <20010709204145.A791@tao.org.uk> <200107092043.f69Khox01571@mass.dis.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200107092043.f69Khox01571@mass.dis.org>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:43:50PM -0700
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1172
Subject: [acpi-jp 1172] Re: Sleep on Inspiron 5000e.
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: joe@tao.org.uk


--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:43:50PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 03:35:38PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > You want to read the=3D20
> > > ACPI spec sections on thermal management, power resources and the=3D20
> > > embedded controller, and acpi_thermal.c, acpi_powerres.c and acpi_ec.=
c.
> > >=3D20
> > > That should keep you busy for a bit. 8)
> >=20
> > Which version do we support?  1.0b or 2.0?
>=20
> We're mostly working for 1.0 coverage, but bearing 2.0 in mind.  Where=20
> it's possible and practical to cover both, that's desirable.
>=20
> See eg. the ACPI CPU stuff I just did; it's mostly 1.0 compliant but=20
> considers the 2.0 issues in its design.

Drat!  Does that mean that I need to read both specs ;) ?

Joe

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjtMOsMACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbsoACfQ8bU8MEpqEOczlMFSbHh72ac
stcAoNDxPuKiXdxBWJ6JbqgWe1SVUmq4
=QTOJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--
