From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Thu Jul 12 04:11:09 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id EAA76228;
	Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:11:09 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (dhcp44-21.dis.org [216.240.44.21])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA76223
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:11:08 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6BJP4e01328;
	Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200107111925.f6BJP4e01328@mass.dis.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:38:44 BST."
             <20010711123844.A797@tao.org.uk> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:25:04 -0700
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1173
Subject: [acpi-jp 1173] Re: Sleep on Inspiron 5000e. 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: msmith@freebsd.org


Please use a mailer that doesn't insert this stupid "=20" rubbish. 8)

> > > Which version do we support?  1.0b or 2.0?
> >=20
> > We're mostly working for 1.0 coverage, but bearing 2.0 in mind.  Where=20
> > it's possible and practical to cover both, that's desirable.
> >=20
> > See eg. the ACPI CPU stuff I just did; it's mostly 1.0 compliant but=20
> > considers the 2.0 issues in its design.
> 
> Drat!  Does that mean that I need to read both specs ;) ?

No; you should be able to work from the 2.0 spec.  It's a lot easier to 
read, and the two are (mostly) compatible.

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E


