From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Sat Jul 21 12:00:50 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id MAA65709;
	Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:00:50 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (cust-P5-R6-162.POOL.ESR.SJO.wwc.com [206.112.109.162])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA65704
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:00:48 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6L31Ad03353;
	Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200107210301.f6L31Ad03353@mass.dis.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
cc: robert.moore@intel.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Jul 2001 11:53:15 +0900."
             <20010721115315N.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:01:10 -0700
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1180
Subject: [acpi-jp 1180] Re: ACPICA 20010717: missing AcpiOsGetRootPointer() in osunixxf.c 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: msmith@freebsd.org

> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to update ports/devel/acpicatools/ and noticed a trivial
> problem in osunixxf.c.  It seems there is no AcpiOsGetRootPointer()
> implementation in osunixxf.c.  I think following patch can fix this.

I'm not sure about in userland, but in the kernel it needs to be:

> diff -u ../work/osunixxf.c ./osunixxf.c
> --- ../work/osunixxf.c	Wed Jul 18 05:52:56 2001
> +++ ./osunixxf.c	Sat Jul 21 11:34:09 2001
> @@ -967,4 +967,11 @@
>      return (AE_OK);
>  }
>  
> +ACPI_STATUS
> +AcpiOsGetRootPointer (
> +    UINT32                  Flags,
> +    ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS   *RsdpPhysicalAddress)
> +{
> +    return (AcpiGetRootPointer(Flags, RsdpPhysicalAddress));
> +}

Or at least, I think so.  I have the new drop integrated and compiling, I 
just need to reboot and test that it still comes up OK on at least one 
machine and then I'll commit.

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E


