From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Fri Nov  2 16:50:49 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id QAA77947;
	Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:50:49 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA77942
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:50:49 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 8631 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2001 07:50:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO laptop.baldwin.cx) ([64.81.54.73]) (envelope-sender <jhb@FreeBSD.org>)
          by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <msmith@freebsd.org>; 2 Nov 2001 07:50:47 -0000
Message-ID: <XFMail.011101235035.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <200110312256.f9VMuhO03342@mass.dis.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 23:50:35 -0800 (PST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>, acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1419
Subject: [acpi-jp 1419] RE: acpi_thermal: small improvement, delayed
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: jhb@FreeBSD.org


On 31-Oct-01 Mike Smith wrote:
>> That's already fixed ;-) I don't know, but I just cvsup'ed and made kernel
>> an
>> d
>> now:
>> 
>> hw.acpi.verbose: 0 -> 1
>> 
>> I don't get much to debug these days, do I? ;-)
> 
> I'm certainly happier that way; less to fix means we broke less in the
> first place. 8)
> 
> I'd just like to say, to all the folk that have been working on chasing down
> these last-10-percent bugs, thank you very much.  This is really important
> work, and we would be much, much worse off without you.
> 
> It doesn't matter whether you're coding an entire ACPI sub-subsystem
> or just fixing an irritating diagnostic, or a sysctl that looks wrong,
> or just telling us that something that used to be wrong is now right,
> it all helps an enormous amount.
> 
> Thanks guys!
> 
>  = Mike

I second that.  Having ACPI working as well as it is is very nice indeed.  On
my 5000e suspend/resume is working quite well and the power button invoking
shutdown -p now has always been exceptionally cool.  Thanks for all the hard
work.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
