From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Wed Nov  7 03:55:43 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id DAA06939;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 03:55:43 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (fmfdns02.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA06933;
	Wed, 7 Nov 2001 03:55:38 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com)
Received: from fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxv043-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.48.128])
	by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.46 2001/10/25 21:02:55 root Exp $) with SMTP id SAA06209;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:55:37 GMT
Received: from fmsmsx28.fm.intel.com ([132.233.42.28])
 by fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.1.6) with SMTP id M2001110610545220413
 ; Tue, 06 Nov 2001 10:54:52 -0800
Received: by fmsmsx28.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <VDTK5VWY>; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:55:57 -0800
Message-ID: <B9ECACBD6885D5119ADC00508B68C1EA2FDFDE@orsmsx107.jf.intel.com>
From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To: "'Mitsuru IWASAKI'" <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org,
        "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>,
        "Therien, Guy"<guy.therien@intel.com>,
        "Diefenbaugh, Paul S" <paul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:55:31 -0800 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1447
Subject: [acpi-jp 1447] RE: ACPI CA Mutex patches
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: robert.moore@intel.com


Yes, I am also changing ownership of the mutex to be a thread instead of a
walk.
Bob


-----Original Message-----
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [mailto:iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:05 AM
To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org; robert.moore@intel.com
Cc: andrew.grover@intel.com; guy.therien@intel.com;
paul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 1439] RE: ACPI CA Mutex patches


Thnaks bob, I agree with you.
# And sorry, I misunderstood a bit about SyncLevel parameter of Mutex :)

> I believe that the problem stems from the fact that we are tracking the
> CurrentSyncLevel on a per-method basis, and not a per-thread basis.  In

Yes, I have the same conclusion.  How about ownership of the Mutex?
Currently it is on a per-method basis (a pointer to WalkState), but
this should be changed too I think (maybe thread or top level of
control method basis?).

Thanks
