From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Wed Dec 12 04:09:56 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle2.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id fBBJ9ub95662;
	Wed, 12 Dec 2001 04:09:56 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from castle.jp.freebsd.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15])
	by castle2.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id fBBJ9um95657
	for <acpi-jp@castle2.jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 04:09:56 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@castle2.jp.freebsd.org)
Received: from calliope1.fm.intel.com (fmfdns01.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.10])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA04279
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 04:09:55 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from andrew.grover@intel.com)
Received: from fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxv042-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.48.110])
	by calliope1.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.46 2001/10/25 21:02:55 root Exp $) with SMTP id TAA02126
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:09:48 GMT
Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.42.29])
 by fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.1.16) with SMTP id M2001121111110504045
 for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:11:05 -0800
Received: by fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <X7DPBXCA>; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:09:48 -0800
Message-ID: <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C42D7DF@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com>
From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org'" <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:09:42 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010331
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1537
Subject: [acpi-jp 1537] RE: ACPICA 20011205
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: andrew.grover@intel.com

Hello Iwasaki-san,

Seems to me that the best solution is for this function to return AE_OK even
if the control methods do not exist. This is what I've done, so you should
be able to re-simplify this code after the next release.

Regards -- Andy

> From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [mailto:iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org]
> -	if (status != AE_OK) {
> +	if (status != AE_OK && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>  	    printf("AcpiEnterSleepStatePrep failed - %s\n",
>  		   AcpiFormatException(status));
