From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Tue Jul  9 01:10:36 2002
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id g68GAa407220;
	Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:10:36 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from pallas.or.intel.com (pallas.or.intel.com [134.134.214.21])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id g68GAZn07215
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:10:36 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from andrew.grover@intel.com)
Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.206])
	by pallas.or.intel.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/d: solo.mc,v 1.42 2002/05/23 22:21:11 root Exp $) with SMTP id g68GAS228138
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:10:29 GMT
Received: from orsmsx26.jf.intel.com ([192.168.65.26])
 by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.2.11) with SMTP id M2002070809104430235
 for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 09:10:44 -0700
Received: by orsmsx26.jf.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <NWKCMALG>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:10:28 -0700
Message-ID: <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C02AB7F74@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com>
From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org'" <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:10:27 -0700 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+020708
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1667
Subject: [acpi-jp 1667] RE: Intel's acpi 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: andrew.grover@intel.com

> From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [mailto:iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org] 
> ACPI_ACQUIRE_GLOBAL_LOCK and ACPI_RELEASE_GLOBAL_LOCK macros are
> defined at acgcc.h in 20020404 version, but now they were removed
> in 20020611 version.  So I defined them in acfreebsd.h.

Hi, I just wanted to mention why this was done -- different arches (IA32 &
IA64) obviously have different defines for these, and it seemed cleaner to
move these defines into the arch-specific headers instead of #ifdefs in
acgcc.h.

Regards -- Andy
