From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Wed Jul 10 05:53:09 2002
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id g69Kr9j26479;
	Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:53:09 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (chfdns02.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id g69Kr7n26471;
	Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:53:07 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from andrew.grover@intel.com)
Received: from fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.128])
	by melete.ch.intel.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/d: solo.mc,v 1.42 2002/05/23 22:21:11 root Exp $) with SMTP id g69Kr5B18280;
	Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:53:05 GMT
Received: from FMSMSX018.fm.intel.com ([132.233.42.197])
 by fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.2.11) with SMTP id M2002070913534502946
 ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 13:53:45 -0700
Received: by fmsmsx018.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <NWJKA5W8>; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:53:05 -0700
Message-ID: <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C02AB7F7F@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com>
From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'Mitsuru IWASAKI'" <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:53:00 -0700 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+020709
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1669
Subject: [acpi-jp 1669] RE: Intel's acpi 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: andrew.grover@intel.com

> From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [mailto:iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org] 
> I thought the same thing.  Could you integrate attached diffs and
> files into your next snapshot?

No, because I don't think arch-specific headers should be included from
acenv.h, but rather from the OS-specific header (e.g. freebsd.h).

Yes it's true, we currently do have both WIN32 and WIN64-specific headers
included directly, but I'd like to see us consolidate those, I think.

Let me know if this is really unworkable for you and we can think further on
a better solution.

Regards -- Andy
