From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Thu Mar 20 06:34:32 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id h2JLYW141148;
	Thu, 20 Mar 2003 06:34:32 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h2JLYV741086
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 06:34:32 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 12648 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Mar 2003 21:34:26 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: current@freebsd.org
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, iwasaki@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303191332050.12646-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:34:26 -0800
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2101
Subject: [acpi-jp 2101] ACPI-CA import/new diff?
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030304

It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there are
a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.  Could
someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
nice to have an import before 5.1R

http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt

Thanks,
Nate

