From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Fri Mar 21 01:00:48 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id h2KG0mv83482;
	Fri, 21 Mar 2003 01:00:48 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id h2KG0l783476
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 01:00:47 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h2KG0fgF067667;
	Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:00:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2KG0ev3067666;
	Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:00:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>
Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, current@freebsd.org, acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org,
   iwasaki@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030320160040.GA67630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303191332050.12646-100000@root.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303201051490.24221@scribble.fsn.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303201051490.24221@scribble.fsn.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:00:40 -0800
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2104
Subject: [acpi-jp 2104] Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030304

On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:58:20AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there
> > are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.
> > Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
> > testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
> > nice to have an import before 5.1R
> > http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt
> I can -at least- report one problem with the current ACPI code. When
> loaded, the kernel freezes right after
> APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery
> 
> When I unset the acpi_load variable (so I don't load ACPI) it works.
> 

Do you have "option MAXMEM" set in your kernel config
file?  I had a similar problem and discovered that
the MAXMEM setting and acpi's idea of the memory in the
system were slightly different.  The is on the order
of 1 kB.

-- 
Steve
