From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Fri Mar 21 09:28:17 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id h2L0SHg97934;
	Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:28:17 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h2L0SH797907
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:28:17 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 14633 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Mar 2003 00:28:12 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: current@freebsd.org
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, iwasaki@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303201051490.24221@scribble.fsn.hu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303201627320.14628-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:28:12 -0800
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2105
Subject: [acpi-jp 2105] Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030304

I wrote:
> > It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there
> > are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.
> > Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
> > testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
> > nice to have an import before 5.1R
> > http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt

I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from
iwasaki@

-Nate

