From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Tue Mar 25 05:18:35 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id h2OKIZ362947;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2003 05:18:35 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h2OKIX462938
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 05:18:34 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 23464 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Mar 2003 20:17:08 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
cc: takawata@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303241201580.23412-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:17:08 -0800
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2115
Subject: [acpi-jp 2115] New acpica test dist
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030304

Thanks for the responses.  I have rolled the latest acpica drop from Intel
(2/28) plus the fix Andrew Grover posted into one diff.  Thanks go to
Takawata-san for the PCI bus walking code.  This diff has been tested and
gives no new problems on my laptop.

  http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-20030228+fix.diff.gz

I have a few questions that we should resolve before posting this to
current@:

* The Linux code (drivers/acpi/osl.c) reads both PCIR_PRIBUS_1 and
PCIR_SECBUS_1 while takawata's code only reads PCIR_SECBUS_1.  Which is
appropriate here?  See Osd/OsdHardware.c portion of diff.

* I ifdef'd out the acpi_object_list code in acpivar.h since it is unused
and now collides with a struct in acpica's code base.  Can we just remove
this or is someone planning to use this code?

Thanks,
-Nate


