From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Thu Apr 24 09:32:28 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h3O0WS063060;
	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:32:28 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from titan.kgt.co.jp (titan.kgt.co.jp [210.141.246.66])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id h3O0WSY63007
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:32:28 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from haro@kgt.co.jp)
Received: from navgw.tt.kgt.co.jp (navgw [210.141.246.71])
	by titan.kgt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 91F6A49F04; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:31:08 +0900 (JST)
Received: from tt.kgt.co.jp (pegasus [192.168.10.1])
	by navgw.tt.kgt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6E38847711; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:31:08 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost [192.168.13.83] by tt.kgt.co.jp with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-7.12) id A04C8B0106; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:31:08 +0900
Message-Id: <20030424.093106.74756218.haro@kgt.co.jp>
To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, nate@root.org
From: Munehiro Matsuda <haro@kgt.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303241201580.23412-100000@root.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303241201580.23412-100000@root.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:31:06 +0900
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2122
Subject: [acpi-jp 2122] Re: New acpica test dist
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: haro@kgt.co.jp
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030405

Hi all,

As we are approching 5.1-BETA, shouldn't we get this version of
ACPI into main tree, before code freeze?
I've been running this code, without problems for a month, now. ;-)

I'm getting bit worried that, we may miss the boat.... :-(

Thanks,
 Haro

From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:17:08 -0800
::Thanks for the responses.  I have rolled the latest acpica drop from Intel
::(2/28) plus the fix Andrew Grover posted into one diff.  Thanks go to
::Takawata-san for the PCI bus walking code.  This diff has been tested and
::gives no new problems on my laptop.
::
::  http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-20030228+fix.diff.gz
::
::I have a few questions that we should resolve before posting this to
::current@:
::
::* The Linux code (drivers/acpi/osl.c) reads both PCIR_PRIBUS_1 and
::PCIR_SECBUS_1 while takawata's code only reads PCIR_SECBUS_1.  Which is
::appropriate here?  See Osd/OsdHardware.c portion of diff.
::
::* I ifdef'd out the acpi_object_list code in acpivar.h since it is unused
::and now collides with a struct in acpica's code base.  Can we just remove
::this or is someone planning to use this code?
::
::Thanks,
::-Nate
::

=------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           _ _    Munehiro (haro) Matsuda
 -|- /_\  |_|_|   Network & Security Dept., Kubota Graphics Technologies Inc.
 /|\ |_|  |_|_|   2-8-8 Shinjuku Shinjuku-ku Tokyo 160-0022, Japan
                  Tel: +81-3-3225-0373  Fax: +81-3-3225-0740
                  Email: haro@kgt.co.jp
