From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Thu Apr 24 13:07:58 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h3O47w798561;
	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:07:58 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id h3O47vY98556
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:07:57 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from scott_long@btc.adaptec.com)
Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11])
	by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3O43QZ22371;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:03:26 -0700
Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com ([10.100.0.52])
	by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03557;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from btc.adaptec.com (hollin [10.100.253.56])
	by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA10556;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:05:49 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <3EA76299.8070305@btc.adaptec.com>
From: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030206
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
CC: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, Munehiro Matsuda <haro@kgt.co.jp>,
   acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, re@freebsd.org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304231758130.61817-100000@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304231758130.61817-100000@root.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:05:45 -0600
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2124
Subject: [acpi-jp 2124] Re: New acpica test dist
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: scott_long@btc.adaptec.com
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030405

John,

Would you be able to review Nate's patches this week?

Thanks,

Scott

Nate Lawson wrote:
> I have reworked the code a bit since while it worked for most people, the
> PCI bus walking portion was not fully functional.  It did not crash but it
> did not always produce the correct result.  My new approach is to use the
> secondary/subordinate bus numbers to find the parent bus.  It needs a day
> or so of testing and then I will post diffs again.  I am coordinating this
> with re@ so it will not miss 5.1
> 
> -Nate
> 
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Munehiro Matsuda wrote:
> 
>>As we are approching 5.1-BETA, shouldn't we get this version of
>>ACPI into main tree, before code freeze?
>>I've been running this code, without problems for a month, now. ;-)
>>
>>I'm getting bit worried that, we may miss the boat.... :-(
>>
>>Thanks,
>> Haro
>>
>>From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
>>Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:17:08 -0800
>>::Thanks for the responses.  I have rolled the latest acpica drop from Intel
>>::(2/28) plus the fix Andrew Grover posted into one diff.  Thanks go to
>>::Takawata-san for the PCI bus walking code.  This diff has been tested and
>>::gives no new problems on my laptop.
>>::
>>::  http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-20030228+fix.diff.gz


