From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Sat Apr 26 04:02:34 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h3PJ2YR91329;
	Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:02:34 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h3PJ2XY91324
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:02:33 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 65649 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Apr 2003 19:01:17 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Soeren Schmidt <sos@spider.deepcore.dk>
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200304251838.h3PIcq0W080807@spider.deepcore.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304251200280.65644-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:01:17 -0700
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2130
Subject: [acpi-jp 2130] Re: New ACPI diffs ready for testing
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030405

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > The 0228 version works fine, just as the old patch you submitted
> > > before, except I get following new messages:
> 
> I've been using the 0228 version (well a homemade patch) for quite some
> time on an ASUS P4S8X with no trouble at all, just FYI...

Thanks.  I'd appreciate your insight on the 0328 version if you have time
to test.  It seems to have some regression in the GPE blk handling.

-Nate

