From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Sat Apr 26 10:30:05 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h3Q1U5w40384;
	Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:30:05 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h3Q1U3Y40378
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:30:03 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 66183 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Apr 2003 01:28:47 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <3EA9DEEE.6040805@btc.adaptec.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304251827140.66142-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:28:47 -0700
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2134
Subject: [acpi-jp 2134] Re: New ACPI diffs ready for testing
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030405

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> [...]
> > Martin Blapp reported this same problem with the 0328 dist.  It looks like
> > GPE handling has been broken recently and so I'm leaning towards importing
> > 0228.
> 
> I'm of the opinion that 0228 is probably a better target too.  In light
> of the hint that there will be an 0424 release from Intel, would you be
> able/interested in evaluating these bits when they come out?

They just released 0424 today and I'll roll a dist and retract the 0328
one since it obviously has problems.  The contest will be between 0228 and
0424 for the 5.1 candidate.

-Nate

