From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Sun Apr 27 03:16:22 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h3QIGMU04012;
	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 03:16:22 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net (bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.218])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id h3QIGJY04007
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 03:16:19 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com)
Received: from pool0174.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.42.174] helo=mindspring.com)
	by bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 199UCW-0002gf-00; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:15:05 -0700
Message-ID: <3EAACC5E.C3351299@mindspring.com>
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org>
CC: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, current@freebsd.org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304250123180.64276-100000@root.org> <20030426013202.J3723@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4725a00e406b7611274c3dc7e384c88de3ca473d225a0f487350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:13:50 -0700
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2140
Subject: [acpi-jp 2140] Re: New ACPI diffs ready for testing
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: tlambert2@mindspring.com
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030405

Doug Barton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I have prepared two versions of ACPI for testing, one from the 0228 dist
> > and one from 0328.
> >
> >     http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-0228.diff.gz
> >     http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-0328.diff.gz
> 
> I just tested 0328 on my thinkpad a21e. I noticed two problems right away.
> First, I couldn't get battery status at all. Second, the following
> messages were scrolling by about once a second:
> 
> ACPI-1284: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.EC__.AC__._PSR] (Node 0xc25c2640), AE_NOT_EXIST

An Intel employee posted that this is fixed in the newest
code drop, which is to be available soon.

You can actually work around this by relaxing the ordering
restrictions (turning the process two-pass).  This is what
Microsoft does for their implementation, I believe.

-- Terry
