From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Sun Apr 27 04:02:49 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h3QJ2nH10336;
	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:02:49 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h3QJ2jY10319
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:02:48 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 69970 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Apr 2003 19:01:29 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <3EAACC5E.C3351299@mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304261200020.69946-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:01:29 -0700
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2141
Subject: [acpi-jp 2141] Re: New ACPI diffs ready for testing
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030405

On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > I just tested 0328 on my thinkpad a21e. I noticed two problems right away.
> > First, I couldn't get battery status at all. Second, the following
> > messages were scrolling by about once a second:
> > 
> > ACPI-1284: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.EC__.AC__._PSR] (Node 0xc25c2640), AE_NOT_EXIST
> 
> An Intel employee posted that this is fixed in the newest
> code drop, which is to be available soon.

It's 0424 and is available now.  I'll be rolling a dist with some fixes.

> You can actually work around this by relaxing the ordering
> restrictions (turning the process two-pass).  This is what
> Microsoft does for their implementation, I believe.

Or you can enter the symbol into the namespace whenever you hit the call
or declaration instead of strictly just the declaration.

-Nate

