From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Sun Apr 27 07:18:10 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h3QMIAX30619;
	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 07:18:10 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id h3QMI9Y30442
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 07:18:10 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com)
Received: from pool0335.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.80] helo=mindspring.com)
	by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 199XyZ-0002qB-00; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:16:56 -0700
Message-ID: <3EAB0505.B3D7D98D@mindspring.com>
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
CC: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, current@freebsd.org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304261200020.69946-100000@root.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a49824c257e7815ebcb0dd0ce8b99a935da7ce0e8f8d31aa3f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:15:33 -0700
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2142
Subject: [acpi-jp 2142] Re: New ACPI diffs ready for testing
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: tlambert2@mindspring.com
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030405

Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > An Intel employee posted that this is fixed in the newest
> > code drop, which is to be available soon.
> 
> It's 0424 and is available now.  I'll be rolling a dist with some fixes.

Cool!  I thought it was going to be weeks, based on the posting!
You work fast!  8-).


> > You can actually work around this by relaxing the ordering
> > restrictions (turning the process two-pass).  This is what
> > Microsoft does for their implementation, I believe.
> 
> Or you can enter the symbol into the namespace whenever you hit the call
> or declaration instead of strictly just the declaration.

I thought there was an order of declaration problem on IBM
ThinkPads, and some VAIO's (the 505?) that prevented this
from happening in a single pass...

-- Terry
