From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Tue Jul 15 02:22:02 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h6EHM2S29638;
	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 02:22:02 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h6EHM1T29631
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 02:22:01 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 17405 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jul 2003 17:21:56 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org, acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20030714142101.GA1706@laptop.6bone.nl>
Message-ID: <20030714102114.O17391@root.org>
References: <20030713161722.Y15284@root.org> <20030714142101.GA1706@laptop.6bone.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:21:56 -0700
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2443
Subject: [acpi-jp 2443] Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030702

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed, but it doesn't
> have any runtime regressions for me so far, so that's good!

Good.  So far things look ok, no reports of new regression.

> However, something I haven't seen reported before, is that it breaks for
> the ACPI_DEBUG case. (Which I have in /etc/make.conf)
>
> The first thing to do is to add the new file dmobject.c to the debugging
> section in the modules/acpi/Makefile.
> However, there are some more hairy things that prevent it from simply just
> working that I am looking into now.

A fix has been tested and committed.

-Nate
