From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Sat Aug 30 01:21:46 2003
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id h7TGLkg62401;
	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:21:46 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id h7TGLja62396
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:21:45 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 43352 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Aug 2003 16:21:40 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: User Takawata <takawata@axe-inc.co.jp>
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200308290529.OAA24046@axe-inc.co.jp>
Message-ID: <20030829092021.F43295@root.org>
References: <200308290529.OAA24046@axe-inc.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:21:40 -0700
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 2629
Subject: [acpi-jp 2629] Re: changed AcpiEnterSleepStateS4Bios
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+030821

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, User Takawata wrote:
> >On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >>   Use the ACPICA AcpiEnterSleepStateS4bios instead of rolling our own.  This
> >>   change also disables interrupts around non-S4 suspends whereas before we
> >>   did not do this.  Our version of AcpiEnterSleepStateS4bios was almost
> >>   identical to the ACPICA version.
> >>
> >>   Revision  Changes    Path
> >>   1.817     +0 -1      src/sys/conf/files
> >>   1.97      +0 -1      src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c
> >>   1.8       +0 -107    src/sys/dev/acpica/acpica_support.c (dead)
> >>   1.2       +0 -38     src/sys/dev/acpica/acpica_support.h (dead)
> >>   1.25      +4 -3      src/sys/i386/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c
> >>   1.31      +2 -3      src/sys/modules/acpi/Makefile
>
> Please don't remove acpica_support.[ch] itself.
> It is place whare we put features
> that is submitted to Intel while they don't
> adopt it.

I understand.  However, both the .h and the .c are empty now and it
doesn't make much sense to keep around empty files in the kernel.  I'll
bring it back when new features are implemented that ACPICA hasn't
imported.

-Nate
