From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Tue Mar 16 03:47:01 2004
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id i2FIl1233957;
	Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:47:01 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with SMTP/inet id i2FIl0733944
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:47:00 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: (qmail 89871 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Mar 2004 18:46:55 -0000
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20040315180010.GE62226@pun.isi.edu>
Message-ID: <20040315104457.X89855@root.org>
References: <20040315144849.GB62226@pun.isi.edu> <20040315094731.Q89517@root.org>
 <20040315180010.GE62226@pun.isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:46:55 -0800
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 3109
Subject: [acpi-jp 3109] Re: [faber@ISI.EDU: [faber@ISI.EDU: power mgmt woes
 on CURRENT with Dell Latitude C610]]
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: nate@root.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+040307

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:48:25AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > You can go back to using apm by uncommenting "device apm" and recompiling
> > your kernel.
>
> They don't seem to play nice together, to the tune of "can't boot with
> both apm and acpi enabled."  :-( And as I said, I can't seem to boot
> without ACPI running.  I can provide errors on the apm && acpi failure
> mode if that's helpful.

After making sure the system works with acpi disabled at the loader
prompt, do this:
echo hint.acpi.0.disabled=\"1\" >> /boot/loader.conf

This is all in the acpi(4) manpage.

> >               Unfortunately, you probably won't be able to boot without
> > acpi because of the bug that results in your system panicing.  That is an
> > important bug to fix as it is a problem with BIOS32 calls.
>
> Is acpi-jp the right place to bring that up?  I'm just trying to find
> the guy who can tweak this into working.  Because all is well under
> -STABLE, including power management, it seems like booting w/o ACPI and
> with APM would be the shortest route to happiness for me.

The underlying problem running without ACPI is already being looked at.
-stable is entirely different than -current.  Feel free to stick to apm if
it works for you.

-Nate
