From owner-man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Nov  8 00:56:55 1999
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id AAA60768;
	Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:56:55 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-man-jp-reviewer@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.nk.rim.or.jp (root@mail.nk.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.165])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA60763
	for <man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:56:55 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from kuma@nk.rim.or.jp)
Received: from laurel.nk.rim.or.jp (JYOcc-01p34.ppp.odn.ad.jp [143.90.98.34])
	by mail.nk.rim.or.jp (8.8.8/3.6W-RIMNET-98-06-09) with ESMTP id AAA09200
	for <man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:56:52 +0900 (JST)
Received: from oasis.laurel.nk.rim.or.jp by laurel.nk.rim.or.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3oasis991011) with ESMTP id AAA17276
	for <man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:57:04 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199911071557.AAA17276@laurel.nk.rim.or.jp>
To: man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Nov 1999 23:35:36 JST."
	 <199911071436.XAA24752@tasogare.imasy.or.jp> 
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 00:57:04 +0900
From: Norihiro Kumagai <kuma@nk.rim.or.jp>
Reply-To: man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+990727
X-Sequence: man-jp-reviewer 1662
Subject: [man-jp-reviewer 1662] Re: gsc.4 
Errors-To: owner-man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-man-jp-reviewer@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: kuma@nk.rim.or.jp

$B7'C+$G$9!#(B

In Message <199911071436.XAA24752@tasogare.imasy.or.jp>,
  mistral@imasy.or.jp (Yoshihiko SARUMARU) writes:
>   gsc.4 $B$G$9!#$J$s$+$h$/$o$+$i$J$$J8$,B?$+$C$?$G$9!D!D!#(B

$B$J$s$+?M@8H>J,Ej$2$H$k$h$&$J=q$-$h$&$G$9$J$!!d86J8(B:-)

> > It is
> > even questionable if external programs would not do this job better
> > thereby not counting to the size of the kernel. 
> $B$C$F$I$&$$$&0UL#$J$s$G$7$g$&!#(B
> > $B$b$730It%W%m%0%i%`$,$3$N:n6H$r$h$j$&$^$/$G$-$J$+$C$?$H$7$F!"(B
> > $B$=$N7k2L%+!<%M%k$NBg$-$5$,8:$k$+$I$&$+$9$i5?Ld$K;W$C$F$$$^$9!#(B
> $B$HL5M}LpM}Lu$7$F$_$^$7$?$,!"$J$K$+0c$&$h$&$J5$$,$7$^$9!#(B

graymap $B%b!<%I$d$k5$$M$'!<$H$$$&46$8$,I:$&86J8$NJ70O5$$G$"$j$^$9!#(B
$B$=$NA0$NJ8$,!"!V(Bgraymap $B%b!<%I$r$^$@%I%i%$%P$K<BAu$7$F$^$7$'!<$s!W$G$9(B
$B$+$i!"!V30It%W%m%0%i%`$G$d$kJ}$,$&$^$/$G$-$J$$$+$I$&$+$O2x$7$$!W$J$s$G(B
$B$7$g$&$M(B (if == whether)$B!#$?$@!"$=$N8e$N!V(Bthereby not counting to the
size of the kernel$B!W$,Ff$G$9$,!#(B

> -.Sh BUGS
> -Even though the scanner device has a little switch by which you should
> -be able to select one of the four resolution modes, I could not yet
> -determine how to read its status. Unless this is not fixed the driver
> -depends on the value passed by means of ioctl(2) which need not match
> -what is selected by the hardware.
> +.Sh $B%P%0(B
> +$B$?$H$(%9%-%c%J%G%P%$%9$K!"(B4 $B$D$N2rA|EY$N$&$A(B 1 $B$D$rA*Br$G$-$k$h$&$K(B
> +$B$J$C$F$$$k>.$5$J%9%$%C%A$,$"$C$?$H$7$F$b!";d$K$O$^$@$=$N>uBV$rCN$kJ}K!$,(B
> +$B$o$+$C$F$$$^$;$s!#(B
> +$B$3$NLdBj$,=$@5$5$l$J$$8B$j!"%O!<%I%&%'%"$K$h$C$FA*Br$5$l$?$b$N$H0lCW$9$k(B
> +$BI,MW$N$J$$(B ioctl(2) $B$K$h$C$F$d$j$H$j$5$l$kCM$K!"%I%i%$%P$O0MB8$7$^$9!#(B

$B$3$NLdBj$,2r7h$5$l$J$$8B$j!"%O!<%I%&%'%"$GA*Br$7$?2rA|EY$H0lCW$9$kJ]>Z(B
$B$N$J$$(B ioctl(2) $B$GEO$7$?CM$K%I%i%$%P$O0MB8$7$^$9!#(B

need not match --> $B!V0lCW$9$kJ]>Z$N$J$$!W$0$i$$$K$7$F$b%P%A$OEv$?$i$s(B
$B$G$7$g$&!#(B

--
$B7'C+(B $BE5Bg(B
