From owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Jun 28 14:34:51 1999
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id OAA93050;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:34:51 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hitpro.hitachi.co.jp (root@hitpro.hitachi.co.jp [133.145.224.7])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA93045
	for <freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:34:50 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from horikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp)
Received: from newton.ebina.hitachi.co.jp by hitpro.hitachi.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-hitpro) id OAA29954; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:48:03 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (horikawa@[172.16.103.145])
	by newton.ebina.hitachi.co.jp (8.9.0/3.7W-EBINA) with ESMTP id OAA08209;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:34:48 +0900 (JST)
To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:32:04 -0700 (PDT)"
	<199906260832.BAA35862@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
References: <199906260832.BAA35862@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19990628143448S.horikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:34:48 +0900 (JST)
From: Kazuo Horikawa <horikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 980923(IM101)
Lines: 58
Reply-To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+990625
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-tech-jp 2324
Subject: [FreeBSD-tech-jp 2324] Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: horikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp

 $BKY@n$G$9!#(B

 $B$"$5$_$5$s$N=q$+$l$?;v9`$r3NG'$5$;$F$/$@$5$$!#(B

 o $B%$%s%9%H!<%k@h$N%G%#%l%/%H%j$O8=>uDL$j(B ja (/usr/share/doc/ja/ $B$H(B
   /usr/share/man/ja)
 o /usr/share/doc/ $B$H(B /usr/share/man $B$K(B ja_JP.eucJP -> ja $B$J$k(B
   $B%7%s%\%j%C%/%j%s%/$r;}$D(B
$B$J$i(B OK $B$H$$$&$3$H$r=q$$$F$$$k$N$G$9$h$M!#(B

# $B0zMQItJ,$G$"$5$_$5$s$,D{@5$5$l$?ItJ,(B (now -> not) $B$OD>$7$^$7$?!#(B


 $B$3$l$r<gD%$9$k:,5r$H$7$F!"(B
 o $B8=>u$N(B
   /usr/share/doc/ja $B$H(B /usr/share/man/ja $B$OF|K\8l(B EUC $B$r3JG<$7$F$$$k(B
$B$N$G!"(Bbackward compatibility $B$rJ]$D$?$a$K(B
 o $B>-Mh$N(B
   /usr/share/doc/ja /usr/share/man/ja $B$bF|K\8l(B EUC $B$r3JG<$9$Y$-(B
   ($B$=$7$F(B /usr/share/doc/ $B$H(B /usr/share/man $B$K(B ja_JP.eucJP -> ja $B$J$k(B
    $B%7%s%\%j%C%/%j%s%/$r;}$D(B)
$B$H(B ($B$b$&0lEY!)(B) $B=q$$$?J}$,$h$$$G$7$g$&$+!)(B


>  * From: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>

>  * > That said, I won't object if your eventual goal will allow a
>  * > per-language *default* in directory names.  For instance, if we can
>  * > put "LANGSUBDIR ?= ja" in ja_JP.eucJP/Makefile to have all the
>  * > Japanese documents install in the "ja" subdir by default (and have
>  * > symlinks pointing to there from ja_JP.eucJP or whatever), that is fine
>  * > for me.  Each language/territory can choose their own default (maybe
>  * > most of them will just want it to be the same as the repository name,
>  * > although I have a hunch that Mandarin folks will prefer "zh" or
>  * > "zh_CN" -- but don't quote me on this) that makes the most sense to
>  * > them.
>  * 
>  * Yes.  I want to allow this flexibility.  In my mind, a sysadmin is likely
>  * to want to install the docs in to a canonical location, and then symlink
>  * to this location from other, possibly friendlier, directory names.

> Yes, in your mind.  That's not how it works for people who deal with
> Japanese.

>  * As an admin myself, I'd want the canonical location to be as precise as
>  * possible, and have the symlinks be less precise.  Which is why I'd suggest
>  * the canonical location be 'ja_JP.eucJP' (or whatever) and the symlinks be
>  * 'ja'.  Other admins (e.g., you) might want this reversed, and have the
>  * canonical directory be 'ja', and the symlinks be things like 'ja_JP.eucJP'.
>  * 
>  * I have no problem with this, and the arguments about which approach should
>  * be the default (6 or 12 months down the line) are likely to more 
>  * entertaining than "vi vs. Emacs" :-)

> Well, as long as you let the Japanese people decide what the default's
> going to be for Japanese stuff, I'm fine. :)
--
$BKY@nOBM:(B
