From owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Jun 28 18:42:37 1999
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id SAA22926;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:42:37 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from firewall1.lehman.com (firewall.Lehman.COM [192.147.65.98])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA22919
	for <freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:42:36 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nclayton@lehman.com)
Received: from relay3.messaging-svcs5.lehman.com by firewall1.lehman.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) id FAA12544; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 05:42:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <19990628104129.V15628@lehman.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:41:29 +0100
From: Nik Clayton <nclayton@lehman.com>
To: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>, Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp>
Cc: freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG,
        freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk, doc@FreeBSD.ORG, kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp,
        jkh@zippy.cdrom.com,
        Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>
References: <199906271240.VAA06437@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp> <199906280427.AAA01972@smtp1.erols.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
In-Reply-To: <199906280427.AAA01972@smtp1.erols.com>; from John Baldwin on Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:27:26AM -0400
Organization: Lehman Brothers
Reply-To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+990625
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-tech-jp 2325
Subject: [FreeBSD-tech-jp 2325] Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: nclayton@lehman.com

On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:27:26AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >>   * How many distinct languages are catered for in that directory?  There's
> >>     no way to tell.
> >> 
> >>   * It's incredibly inconsistent.  Look at
> >> 
> >>        en_US.utf/      US English, probably
> > 
> > I think "en" is better.  Because English is used in many countries
> > (U.K., Austraria, New Zealand, etc.).
> 
> Yeah, but US English is a bit different than British English.. mostly in the
> form of idioms.  Although I doubt it, it is entirely possible, that we might
> end up with a en_UK.ISO-8559-1 (or whatever it is called).

Yep.  The Makefile in there would s/color/colour/ before generating any
of the files. . .

N
-- 
--+==[ Systems Administrator, Year 2000 Test Lab, Lehman Brothers, Inc. ]==+--
--+==[      1 Broadgate, London, EC2M 7HA     0171-601-0011 x5514       ]==+--
--+==[              Year 2000 Testing: It's about time. . .             ]==+--
