From owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Jun 28 19:52:57 1999
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id TAA28210;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:52:57 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from firewall2.lehman.com (firewall.Lehman.COM [192.147.65.99])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA28205
	for <freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:52:55 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from nclayton@lehman.com)
Received: from relay3.messaging-svcs5.lehman.com by firewall2.lehman.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) id GAA11587; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:52:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <19990628115159.D15628@lehman.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:51:59 +0100
From: Nik Clayton <nclayton@lehman.com>
To: Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp>
Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>,
        Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp, doc@FreeBSD.ORG,
        freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG,
        freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
References: <57461.930305624@zippy.cdrom.com> <199906251220.VAA22552@sakura.snipe.rim.or.jp> <19990625150942.K15628@lehman.com> <199906252311.QAA04505@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990626014203.B71532@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <199906271240.VAA06437@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp> <199906271938.EAA10022@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
In-Reply-To: <199906271938.EAA10022@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp>; from Motoyuki Konno on Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 04:38:16AM +0900
Organization: Lehman Brothers
Reply-To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+990625
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-tech-jp 2327
Subject: [FreeBSD-tech-jp 2327] Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: nclayton@lehman.com

On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 04:38:16AM +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote:
> Nik>   * It's incredibly inconsistent.  Look at
> Nik> 
> Nik>        en_US.utf/      US English, probably
> 
> motoyuki:
> m> I think "en" is better.  Because English is used in many countries
> m> (U.K., Austraria, New Zealand, etc.).
> 
> If we make the doc directory trees all over again, 'en_US.utf' may
> be good.  But, there already exists 'doc/en' directory.  Directory
> name change is a very hard work, as you know, so I think we should
> continue to use 'doc/en'.

No, for all the reasons that I've outlined in previous messages.

> And, I don't like the name 'en_US.utf' because English is used in
> many countries in addition to United States. :-)

I know.  If it makes you feel any different I'm English (British, whatever),
and I still want to move to en_US.ISO-8859-1, because it accurately 
describes what that directory contains.

N
-- 
--+==[ Systems Administrator, Year 2000 Test Lab, Lehman Brothers, Inc. ]==+--
--+==[      1 Broadgate, London, EC2M 7HA     0171-601-0011 x5514       ]==+--
--+==[              Year 2000 Testing: It's about time. . .             ]==+--
