From owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Tue Jun 29 18:32:23 1999
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id SAA07337;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:32:23 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from alice.gba.oz.au (gba-254.tmx.com.au [203.9.155.254])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA07320
	for <freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:32:19 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from gjb-freebsd@gba.oz.au)
Received: (qmail 15692 invoked by uid 1001); 29 Jun 1999 18:50:43 +1000
Message-ID: <19990629085043.15691.qmail@alice.gba.oz.au>
X-Posted-By: GBA-Post 1.03 20-Sep-1998
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5A91 6942 8CEA 9DAB B95B  C249 1CE1 493B 2B5A CE30
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:50:42 +1000
From: Greg Black <gjb-freebsd@gba.oz.au>
To: Nik Clayton <nclayton@lehman.com>
Cc: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>, Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp>,
        freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG,
        freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk, doc@FreeBSD.ORG, kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp,
        jkh@zippy.cdrom.com,
        Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>
References: <199906271240.VAA06437@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp>
	<199906280427.AAA01972@smtp1.erols.com>
	<19990628104129.V15628@lehman.com> 
In-reply-to: <19990628104129.V15628@lehman.com> 
    of Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:41:29 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+990625
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-tech-jp 2352
Subject: [FreeBSD-tech-jp 2352] Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation 
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: gjb-freebsd@gba.oz.au

> > >>        en_US.utf/      US English, probably
> > > 
> > > I think "en" is better.  Because English is used in many countries
> > > (U.K., Austraria, New Zealand, etc.).
> > 
> > Yeah, but US English is a bit different than British English.. mostly in the
> > form of idioms.  Although I doubt it, it is entirely possible, that we might
> > end up with a en_UK.ISO-8559-1 (or whatever it is called).
> 
> Yep.  The Makefile in there would s/color/colour/ before generating any
> of the files. . .

I hope it would also s/British English/English/ as well.  The
idea that real English needs some qualifier is pretty weird.

-- 
Greg Black -- <gjb@acm.org> or <gjb@computer.org>
Fight censorship in Australia: <http://www.efa.org.au>

