From owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Thu Dec 28 11:13:30 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id LAA25978;
	Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:13:30 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mfo00.iij.ad.jp (mfo00.iij.ad.jp [202.232.2.117])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA25968
	for <FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:13:30 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from okuyamak@dd.iij4u.or.jp)
Received: from dd.iij4u.or.jp (dd.iij4u.or.jp [210.130.0.14])
	by mfo00.iij.ad.jp (8.8.8/MFO1.3) with ESMTP id LAA00452
	for <FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:13:29 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (wyoming.yamato.ibm.com [203.141.89.171])
	by dd.iij4u.or.jp (8.8.8+2.2IIJ/4U1.1) with ESMTP id LAA13252
	for <FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:13:29 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:04:25 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20001228.110425.71087686.okuyamak@dd.iij4u.or.jp>
To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
From: Kenichi Okuyama <okuyamak@dd.iij4u.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <200012271258.VAA14441@srapc342.sra.co.jp>
References: <86wvcmm4kc.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp>
	<20001227.214852.92571718.okuyamak@dd.iij4u.or.jp>
	<200012271258.VAA14441@srapc342.sra.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b91 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-tech-jp 3006
Subject: [FreeBSD-tech-jp 3006] Re: Unicode support in cd9660 [patch
 for review]
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: okuyamak@dd.iij4u.or.jp

>>>>> "NS" == Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp> writes:
NS> No. there is another one.
NS> I.e.
NS> 	3) Always use pair of "codeset" name and "codepoint" value
NS> 	  for interface.
NS> This keeps compatibility with current filesystems which use legacy
NS> encodings like ISO-8859-1 or EUC-JP as pathnames.

But that's "MULTI-BYTE" format, dear(^o^)

It is true that we should have "SINGLE-WORD" format( ah... well,
rather, should I say "fixed length, byte order fixed" format )
rather than "MULTI-BYTE", for ease.

Using "codeset-codepoint pair" can be nothing more than tactics.  It
does not have any prove that "next coming character is also
codeset-codepoint pair"ed formatted or not. And we still have to
face the Multi-byte handling codes.
---- 
Kenichi Okuyama@Tokyo Research Lab, IBM-Japan, Co.
